Delaware

Delaware United’s 2019 Legislative Accountability Report Card

Over the last few months, after the close of the 2019 half of the 150th General Assembly, the good folks at Delaware United, along with various partners, which included myself, representing Blue Delaware, helped craft the 2019 Legislative Accountability Report Card. It is a good tool to grade the votes and engagement of our legislators on important Democratic and progressive issues that faced the General Assembly this year.

From Delaware United:

The Legislative Accountability Report Card (LARC) is created by about half a dozen statewide groups and numerous citizen activists working together to hold State Senators and Representatives accountable for their voting records. LARC Committee members compile, analyze, and format data so Delawareans can easily see how their legislators performed throughout the year.

The LARC only includes legislation that made it to a vote in one chamber or another and does not include resolutions in either chamber. Resolutions are often ceremonial, normally are unanimously supported, and sometimes only require a voice vote, all of that makes them hard to track and not necessary in the grand scheme of things with regard to the LARC’s purpose.

Legislators’ issue scores are based on a four-point scale. Let’s say you are a legislator. If you voted as the LARC Committee preferred, you receive a “4” for that bill. If you voted to oppose the way the LARC Committee preferred, you receive a “0” for that bill. If you were absent, you receive a “2.” If you abstained from voting, you receive a “0.”

Being absent on one bill likely will not reduce a legislator’s score much, but excessive absenteeism can impact the LARC grade. Further, a legislator’s job is to research proposed legislation and vote on it. By abstaining, legislators deny constituents the right to know where they stand on important topics. Therefore, abstaining from voting can seriously impact a legislator’s grade.

In the past, Legislators’ final letter grades have been based on quintiles. All legislators’ issue grades are averaged and based on those averages, each legislator falls into one of the quintile grades–A, B, C, D, or F. Legislators’ final grades show Delawareans how individual legislators compare to each other. The grades are based on quintiles, so an “A” is excellent, a “B” is very good/above average, a “C” is satisfactory/average, a “D” is needing improvement, and those with an “F” are the bottom tier performers.

Starting in 2019, to reduce confusion the LARC final grades were not translated into letter grades. Instead, the scores remained in number format, so people can better see the spread of the scores across all legislators without having to go back and forth to the full datasheets.

If you do not know who your current legislators are, please visit Legis.Delaware.Gov and use the “Who Is My Legislator” tool.

Some other updates in 2019: In 2018, concerns were raised that some bills were not included in the final project. We surveyed the bills last year and found that it would not have made an impact on the overall score of any legislator, so we elected not to do a re-release. In 2019, we decided to include virtually all non-housekeeping or hyper-local bills (such as routine charter changes). This means that some days there were multiple pieces of legislation that were voted on in a single day that made it onto the LARC this year. So, if a legislator missed that day, their attendance on that one day could have impacted their overall score more drastically than it did in 2018.

Delaware politics from a liberal, progressive and Democratic perspective. Keep Delaware Blue.

8 comments on “Delaware United’s 2019 Legislative Accountability Report Card

  1. Newark Dem

    Just curious…was there any allocation for an abstention because of a conflict of interest? I would think we would want to encourage abstentions in those cases and with as small a state as Delaware is, the occasional conflict is unavoidable.

    • Delaware Dem

      In the voting records that are published on the General Assembly website, votes were a member is abstaining due to a conflict are not noted as “Absent” with an “A” but as “Conflict” with a “C.” In putting together our own Vote Trackers here at Blue Delaware, I can recall that happening only once in the last session, and I classified it as a “Not Voting” for our purposes rather than being Absent. I am uncertain how the folks at Delaware United addressed the issue, but my point is that it is a rare occurrence.

      • Dustyn Thompson

        Great question. There was actually a couple of bills that had people abstaining because of conflict of interest. They were marked as such, and those votes did not count for or against the person citing conflict.

  2. Newark Dem

    Thanks for the info. I look forward to digging into the raw data. This is great work by all involved.

  3. Thanks for all the work you put into it DD. Couldn’t have done it without you.

  4. The fact that Poore and Longhurst have perfect or near-perfect scores is a joke. I assume this rubric doesn’t include any demerit if you block progressive legislation?

    • Seems like that is correct. No negative points for Poore procedurally killing any shot at gun reform in the state.

    • Dustyn Thompson

      If you can come up with a provable objective way to measure that, the team would certainly love to hear it. Conjecture and inside information, which of course we all have on this matter, cannot be used in an objective measurement of data. It is very unfortunate that this is the case, but nonetheless. Also, Delaware United specifically pointed out the fact that many important bills did not get a vote in their posting on Facebook, just as an fyi.

      No system is perfect, and that is why it is important to use this tool in the context of other measures and in context of the the historical data we provide on the webpage.

      Poore was not alone on the gun bills, and I’d be curious to hear what legislation you are speaking about in relation to Longhurst. Just out of curiosity.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: