Health Care National

These Are Lies, Not “Fibs”

TPM has a post up entitled, “The 5 Biggest Fibs Republicans Used To Pass The House Obamacare Repeal Bill“. Let’s take a look at these 5 “fibs”.

1.“Everyone” with a pre-existing condition will keep coverage.

That there is a big ol’ LIE. We even have video of Republicans admitting that people with pre-existing conditions will not keep their coverage. Sure, they may have “access” to coverage, but not coverage they can begin to afford. And when pressed, Republicans admit this.

Here’s the truth:

The bill, however, will allow states to apply for waivers to Obamacare’s community rating rule, which limits how much insurers can charge people with pre-existing conditions. If they get a waiver—which the text of the bill indicates will be very easy—people with anything in their medical file from a C-section to congenital heart disease could be priced out of the market altogether.

Some lawmakers were more honest about this possibility, telling reporters states should have the right to gut these protections, and people should just move to another state if they have to.

2. “Nobody” on Medicaid will lose coverage.

Gutting Medicaid is a feature, not a bug of this bill.

But the math speaks for itself: the bill will slash $880 billion in funding to Medicaid over the next 10 years, the Congressional Budget Office found.

How those cuts will affect enrollees is multifaceted. The CBO predicted that 14 million fewer Americans would be receiving Medicaid under the law, a decrease of enrollment of 17 percent. This finding was partly because the American Health Care Act will phase out the match rate for the expansion program—which raised the eligibility cut-off to those making as much as 138 percent of the federal poverty line—by imposing a “freeze” on enrollment in 2020.

[…]

The cuts grow more devastating in the long-term, with the transformation of the Medicaid program from an unlimited match rate to a per capita cap system, meaning that states would get a fixed amount of funding per enrollee. In theory, this means that federal funding would rise with every additional enrollee participating in the program. But because the metric that the bill uses to increase the capped amounts rises more slowly than average Medicaid spending, over time states will be taking on a bigger share of the burden and are anticipated to turn to premium sharing, copays or other obstacles that shrink costs while impeding access to the program.

And with removing schools as medicaid-funded providers the GOP has made our special education needs children more vulnerable.

3. People will have “much lower” deductibles.

According to an analysis by the Kaiser Family Foundation done for Axios, deductibles for a typical health insurance plan under the GOP legislation would raise by $1,550 — from $2,550 under Obamacare to $4,100 — in 2017.

That is because the Republican bill incentivizes a shift to stingier — albeit cheaper, premium-wise — plans. The CBO said that insurance plans under the Republican legislation would cover an average of 65 percent of person’s medical costs, versus an Obamacare plan’s average actuarial value of 72 percent.

Welcome back, junk insurance!

4. The bill will only impact a “very narrow band” of people.

Republicans have repeatedly played down the number of people their bill would affect, by stressing that many of the changes would apply only to the a relatively small number of people.

[…]

But Americans who receive their insurance through their employer — nearly 156 million people, or about half of the country — are also vulnerable to seeing the Affordable Care Act’s consumer protections rolled back for them.

[…]

For instance, it is possible the annual and lifetime caps in employer plans could be brought back under the GOP bill because the ACA’s ban on them is based on a state’s essential health benefits standards. If a state received a waiver to eliminate, say maternity coverage, from the essential health benefits, then employer plans could reintroduce caps on that coverage.

Not to mention how dropping the employer mandate will result in some employers dropping coverage all together.

5. Obamacare is in “crisis.”

“This is not a choice. This is a crisis,” Ryan practically shouted, pointing to news last week that the majority of Iowa’s counties would be left without any insurer on the individual market.

Yet the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office found in its March report that “the nongroup market would probably be stable in most areas” if Obamacare remains in place. Another report by S&P Global late last year predicted that: “For 2017, we expect continued improvement, with more insurers reporting close to break-even or better results for this segment.”

[…]

In short, the administration is saying “Obamacare will explode” while taking steps to make that happen.

These are not fibs. These are lies. Really big lies.

10 comments on “These Are Lies, Not “Fibs”

  1. Brought to you by the same people who told you that Obama was a Kenyan and was coming for your guns, right? (That was on a great cartoon on FB yesterday.)

    Media Matters (sorry for the FB link) compiled a number of clips of local news stations covering the impacts of the bill to their local communities. So while the GOP is lying through their teeth, it sure looks like local media is making sure people know what’s going on.

    • ALSO, part of MM’s point is that the cable news is falling for the spin, not the local outfits.

    • And what about the lies from Demo’s when the UnAffordable Care act was past. Be fair now, list both sides!

      • Point of Order

        This post listed a non-exhaustive list of the lies currently being told by Republicans to the people. If we must revisit the original passage and explanation of PPACA, we must also revisit the lies told by Republicans at that time as well, to be fair.

        Let’s be super fair, list the lies Dem’s are telling about Trumpcare today and compare.

  2. wikwox

    I meet a great many people as a working musician, the question I ask is “What do you think of Medicare for everyone?”. The response is near universal : “I think that would be great!”. I also remind them that Medicare is no giveaway as premiums run to $2,400 a year for my wife and the copay is 20% for some services. Another favorite is “What do you think about the cost of drugs in America, they charge us double what the rest pay”. After this I step back and await the explosion as it always comes. People know damn well what’s going on and yet fail to connect it to the politicians, of either party, the corruption is obvious. The AHCA is in for near total condemnation if it passes, even in a modified version from the senate. And the longer it takes the more focused the attacks will be on the men and women behind it. There may yet be gain from the current pain of the Trump regime.

  3. Mitch McConnell is on record as saying that Dems won’t have any input to the Senate rewrite. So I’m thinking that Dems should have a Plan B that pretty clearly reflects Medicare for All or something similar. Or definitely fixes Obamacare — more subsidies, a Public Option or Medicare for All. Get out and sell it. Be the clear pragmatic choice and be the option that the GOP plan gets compared to.

    And I want Dems to stop saying they’ll work with the GOP on this. Because it is pretty clear the GOP doesn’t want their help.

    • wikwox

      I’m hoping every Dem, including Tom Carper, come out for Medicare for everybody. It has long been proven as the best and most efficient way to deliver care and would hark back to the New Deal nicely. Worked for Bernie it can work for the Dems as a whole.

  4. You REALLY want the government to handle your healthcare??
    Have you ever been to a state run facility, for the elderly? Go to Pocopson, it’s disgusting, stinks, they don’t get the people up and about. Sometimes, 4 to a small room!

    You’ll have long waits for a test.
    Dr. will be second guessed. By someone in an office, who has never met the patient. Someone who doesn’t know their background.
    Government bureaucracy would grow!
    TAXES would grow, considerably.

    Medical abuse can lead to rationing.

    There has to be a better way. The ACA, has cost a great deal of wasteful monies being spent to put it out; advertising, seminars, etc. And has cost more money. People need and should have healthcare, but the government can’t run it…..just look at the VA!

    • One day we’re going to have a contest to see who can string together the greatest number of talking points to say exactly nothing.

    • delacrat

      “You REALLY want the government to handle your healthcare??” – anono

      The rest of the industrialized world REALLY wants their governments to handle the healthcare of their citizens.

      Do you want your boss to handle your healthcare??

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: