The Open Thread for February 28, 2017

The California-based friend the Freeway Blogger is back. He writes:

“I was ALL SET to go on a trip around the world (friends in Thailand, Burma, India, Paris, Sao Paolo and Buenos Aires…) But NOOOOOOOO… You all had to go and elect Donald Trump…

We’ll see how it goes this time around – (maybe now people will be inspired to follow my lead a bit. Seriously, I’ve posted 7,209 signs since 2000. Talked to cops maybe a dozen times and never been arrested.) Any ideas on how to inspire people let me know… will keep in touch.”

He was famous during the Bush years of placing “Impeach” signs on overpasses on highways throughout the country. You can follow him on Twitter or at his blog.

President Trump “may rally Republicans on a strategy to repeal and replace Obamacare in his speech to Congress [tonight]. But the reality is his administration still has to contend with huge divisions within the GOP that have turned its top policy goal into a long and uncertain slog,” Politico reports.   “Republicans lack consensus on such basic questions as how much to spend to reshape the health system, how much financial help to give Americans to buy insurance and how to come up with the money to pay for it all.”

Martin Longman speaks for me: “Perez and Ellison are a team now, and that seems to have ruined the Pout Party some of Ellison’s more unhinged supporters had planned for this week.   As a progressive, I’m happy with the outcome and I don’t have any more patience left for folks who are more interested in fake fights than real ones.”  I completely agree.

This photo is like an SNL skit of Trump and Kellyanne.

Mike Allen: “Forget the theater, the palace intrigue, the stumbles. One thing you should know on Day 40 (and soon the 40th night) of President Trump is this: This a Bannon-Miller presidency in the making. Think about the dark view of the state of the world, of the state of our nation, of the state of media. This is the worldview of the Stephens — chief strategist Bannon and policy guru Miller — trumpeted by Trump.”

We see this in:

  • A budget draft that guts the regulatory state to fund a defense build-up.
  • A war without end with the media, where allies like Breitbart get Oval Office face time and frenemies like the New York Times get endlessly tagged as evil.
  • A clamp-down on immigrants, visitors from Muslim countries, trade, companies exporting jobs.
  • A dismissive view of the U.N. and conventional views on China.
  • The slow destruction of political norms, and Washington customs and niceties.

President Trump “has been dismissing the protests against his presidency and demonstrations at congressional town hall meetings across the country as concocted by his political enemies. But now he has an alleged culprit: Barack Obama,” the Washington Post reports.  Said Trump: “I think that President Obama is behind it because his people certainly are behind it. In terms of him being behind things, that’s politics. It will probably continue.”

New York Review of Books: “On February 27, 1933 the German Parliament building burned, Adolf Hitler rejoiced, and the Nazi era began. Hitler, who had just been named head of a government that was legally formed after the democratic elections of the previous November, seized the opportunity to change the system.”

“The Reichstag fire shows how quickly a modern republic can be transformed into an authoritarian regime. There is nothing new, to be sure, in the politics of exception. The American Founding Fathers knew that the democracy they were creating was vulnerable to an aspiring tyrant who might seize upon some dramatic event as grounds for the suspension of our rights. As James Madison nicely put it, tyranny arises ‘on some favorable emergency.’ What changed with the Reichstag fire was the use of terrorism as a catalyst for regime change. To this day, we do not know who set the Reichstag fire: the lone anarchist executed by the Nazis or, as new scholarship by Benjamin Hett suggests, the Nazis themselves. What we do know is that it created the occasion for a leader to eliminate all opposition.”

“President Trump’s proposal to slash domestic spending in order to preserve the two biggest drains on the federal government — Social Security and Medicare — has set up a battle to determine who now controls the Republican Party’s ideology,” the New York Times reports.

“The outcome could map the course of major challenges to come, including a revision of the tax code, a huge increase in infrastructure spending and any effort to balance the budget.”

“Mr. Trump’s budget blueprint — which is expected to be central to his address to Congress on Tuesday night — sets up a striking clash with the House speaker, Paul D. Ryan, who has made a career out of pressing difficult truths on federal spending. For years, Mr. Ryan has maintained that to tame the budget deficit without tax increases and prevent draconian cuts to federal programs, Congress must be willing to change, and cut, the programs that spend the most money — Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.”

From Politico:  “Congressional Republicans on Monday panned Donald Trump’s call to finance a military buildup by slashing domestic agencies and ignoring entitlement programs — undermining the president’s budget even before it’s been finalized,”  reports.

“The consternation spanned the party’s ranks just one day before Trump addresses Congress for his first time Tuesday evening: House GOP fiscal hawks said it was ludicrous to think they’d pass a budget that did not address ballooning costs in Medicare and Social Security, the main drivers of the national debt. Pragmatic-minded GOP appropriators scratched their heads over where Trump would siphon off $54 billion in domestic cuts. And GOP defense hawks said the Pentagon budget boost doesn’t go nearly far enough.”

Washington Post: Trump’s promise to leave entitlements alone leaves GOP in a quandary.

“Last month’s deadly commando raid in Yemen, which cost the lives of a U.S. Navy SEAL and a number of children, has so far yielded no significant intelligence,” U.S. officials told NBC News.   “A senior Congressional official briefed on the matter said the Trump administration has yet to explain what prompted the rare use of American ground troops in Yemen, but he said he was not aware of any new threat from al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, the al Qaeda affiliate that was targeted.”

President Trump personally signed off on the surprise phone checks conducted last week by White House press secretary Sean Spicer during an investigation into leaks, sources tell CNN.  Trump also approved Spicer’s decision to restrict several media outlets from a press briefing last week.

Mickey Edwards: “Instead of three equal, independent branches, each a check on the others, today’s federal government is, for practical purposes, made up of either two branches or one, depending on how you do the math. The modern presidency has become a giant centrifuge, sucking power from both Congress and the states, making de facto law through regulation and executive order. Yet the growing power of the executive is not merely a case of presidential power lust. For decades, the Supreme Court has consistently held that on most policy questions, foreign as well as domestic, statute trumps fiat. But if Congress subordinates its constitutional duties to political concerns, what then?”

“Presidents have managed to accumulate such a prominent place at the top of what is now increasingly a pyramid rather than a horizontal structure of three connected blocks because for more than a generation, Congress has willingly abandoned both its constitutional responsibilities and its ability to effectively serve as a check on the executive even when it wishes to do so.”

Edward Luce: “He was supposed to be leading a revolt against America’s elites. In practice Donald Trump is laying out a banquet for their delectation. The Trump White House is drawing up plans for across-the-board deregulation, tax cuts and a new generation of defence contracts. The only question is at what speed.”

“In contrast, Mr Trump’s middle-class economic plans, such as they were, are already receding. The chances of a big infrastructure bill are rapidly dimming. In marketing they call this bait and switch. The effect of Mr Trump’s economic agenda will be to deepen the conditions that gave rise to his candidacy.”

“With President Trump now vowing to put forward a replacement for the Affordable Care Act in March, some California politicians and healthcare advocates are once again promoting the idea of a state-run ‘single-payer’ system that operates like Medicare,” the Los Angeles Times reports.  “Backers say the uncertainty surrounding Trump’s promise to repeal Obamacare presents California with a chance to rethink how healthcare is delivered to its 39 million residents.”

“In a single-payer system, residents would pay into a state agency that essentially functions as an insurance company. The agency would pay doctors and hospitals when people sought treatment.”


Delaware politics from a liberal, progressive and Democratic perspective. Keep Delaware Blue.

12 comments on “The Open Thread for February 28, 2017

  1. Found the bit about Social Security , Medicare and Medicaid as chief culprits of the deficit to be a Paul Ryan festival of lies and half truths. Having said that I hope Trump and the Republicans attack these three programs with gusto and their usual barrage of insanity, if you think you’ve seen protests thus far think again, the anger produced will rival the day after Pearl Harbor.

  2. “… Ellison’s more unhinged supporters…”

    Will Ellison’s supporters and working class voters generally, “unhinge” from the Democratic party in 2018, like they did in 2016 ?

  3. I find it curious that the unhinged far left thinks that if it competes in an intra-party competition of some kind, whether it be for the party chair or for the presidential nomination, the field should and must be cleared for them as a courtesy.

    • Clearing the field for candidates that don’t discomfit Wall St., Haim Saban and the “unhinged far” right…

      ….how’ed that work for ya last November?

      • There wasn’t a cleared field. Unless I am misremembering a Democratic primary last year.

        • No, Cass, it is insulting to the far left for them to even have to compete in primary contests. They ironically expect to be coronated without opposition.

        • And yet, these guys couldn’t be bothered supporting John Fetterman. That still floors me. He was everything they claimed to want, and they gave him zero love.

          • “Though lacking statewide name recognition, low campaign funds, and polling as low as 4% a week before the primary,[24] Fetterman was able to garner 20% of the primary vote. “


            “…they gave him zero love”, my ass.

          • “Low campaign funds”

            I rest my case. Imagine if you guys had opened your wallets or if you’d held one of those rallies for him how much better he could have done. You know, at some point you actually have to win a race – not just brag how you lose them.

            And you’ve been all over this site crowing on how you and people who agree with you gave us President Trump. Congratulations. You must not have anything on the line. I see that with people cheering on the repeal of the ACA and how people losing their access to health care will show those Republicans. They’re rarely the ones who will lose their health insurance. Must be nice to be you.

        • Donna Brazile feeding questions to Clinton prior to the debate…

          That’s a cleared field.

      • Hillary Clinton comforts the far right? LOL. Tom Perez is a conservative? LOL. See, this is why I call you, accurately, unhinged. You are insane.

  4. Kellyanne Conway has no Home Training. None.

    Anyone remember when the wingnuts went berserk over Obama not wearing a tie in the Oval Office?

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: